ArticleMedicine2025
The impact of removing cannulated screws after femoral neck fracture surgery on middle-aged and young patients.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence and risk factors for fixation failure of femoral neck fractures in adults: a single-center multifactorial analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate whether the removal of cannulated screws after healing in femoral neck fractures increases the risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in middle-aged and young patients, and to explore the potential effects of screw removal on these individuals. A retrospective study was conducted involving 112 patients with simple femoral neck fractures treated between July 2017 and July 2021. All patients underwent closed reduction and internal fixation with inverted triangular cannulated screws by a single senior surgeon within 72 hours of injury. The study categorized 30 patients who had their screws removed 1 year after healing into the "removal group," while the remaining 82 patients who retained their screws formed the "retention group." Outcomes measured included the incidence of ONFH, Harris hip scores, and SF-36 questionnaire scores. Patients with ONFH, fixation failure, or nonunion were excluded from the analysis of the Harris hip score and SF-36 results. Follow-up duration ranged from 24 to 32 months, with an average of 26 months, and there were no cases of fixation failure or nonunion. Age, BMI, and gender were comparable between the 2 groups (P > .05). ONFH was observed in 14 patients (17%) from the retention group and 10 patients (33.3%) from the removal group, with no significant difference (P > .05). At 1-year post-injury, both Harris hip and SF-36 scores showed no significant differences between groups (P > .05). However, at 2 years, the removal group demonstrated significantly higher scores than the retention group (P < .05). Removing cannulated screws from the femoral neck in healthy middle-aged and young patients does not increase the risk of ONFH and may enhance their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.