ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Assessing the Impact of Frailty on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Complications in 2-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 5-item modified frailty index (5-mFI) is used to predict clinical outcomes in breast reconstruction, but its relationship to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after 2-stage implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is unclear. This study evaluates how frailty is associated with clinical outcomes and PROs using the BREAST-Q. The authors hypothesized that higher 5-mFI scores would correlate with poorer outcomes and PROs.
methodsPatients aged 18 years or older who underwent immediate 2-stage IBR from January of 2017 to April of 2023 were included. Complications (eg, reconstructive failure, salvage, cellulitis/infection, seroma, mastectomy skin flap necrosis) and BREAST-Q scores for sexual well-being, psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with breasts, and physical well-being of the chest (PWBC) were compared between low-frailty (5-mFI <2) and high-frailty (5-mFI ≥2) groups at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after exchange.
resultsOf 2697 patients, 2569 (95%) were low frailty. Seroma rates differed significantly between frailty cohorts, but frailty status was not associated with complications on multivariable analysis. High-frailty patients reported significantly lower satisfaction with breasts preoperatively and 2 years after exchange. Low-frailty patients consistently had better PWBC scores than high-frailty patients. Physical well-being and sexual well-being scores were significantly higher in low-frailty patients preoperatively and at 6 months. Multivariable analysis confirmed that increased frailty was associated with lower PWBC scores.
conclusionsAlthough the 5-mFI has does not effectively predict outcomes for all aspects of the BREAST-Q, it may be useful for predicting PWBC for patients undergoing 2-stage IBR. Furthermore, it may not be an effective metric to predict IBR postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.