ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Enhancing Patient-Trial Matching With Large Language Models: A Scoping Review of Emerging Applications and Approaches.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging electronic health records for atrial fibrillation cohort generation.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
- From Invisible to Enrolled: How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Clinical Trial Recruitment.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a clinical trial knowledge management application for community oncology.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: Clinical applications, challenges, and future directions.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Article
- Large Language Models in Clinical Trial Recruitment: Sociotechnical and Economic Framework Development Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Translating evidence into practice: adapting TrialGPT for real-world clinical trial eligibility screening.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- EC2Seq2Sql: Patient-trial matching with LLM agents.PloS one · 2026Article
- AI-augmented frameworks for enhancing Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: A memory clinic perspective.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- New chapter in pediatric medicine: technological evolution, application, and evaluation system of large language models.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatient recruitment remains a major bottleneck in clinical trial execution, with inefficient patient-trial matching often causing delays and failures. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for automating and improving this process. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging applications of LLMs in patient-trial matching.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and OpenAlex for literature published between December 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024. Studies were included if they explicitly integrated LLMs into patient-trial matching systems. Data extraction focused on system architectures, patient data processing, eligibility criteria processing, matching techniques, evaluation metrics, and performance.
resultsOf the 2,357 studies initially identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria. The majority (21/24) were published in 2024, highlighting the rapid adoption of LLMs in this domain. Most systems used patient-centric matching (17/24), with OpenAI's generative pretrained transformer models being the most commonly used LLM. Core components of these systems included eligibility criteria processing, patient data processing, and matching, with some incorporating retrieval algorithms to enhance computational efficiency. LLM-integrated approaches demonstrated improved accuracy and scalability in patient-trial matching, although challenges such as performance variability, interpretability, and reliance on synthetic data sets remain significant.
conclusionLLM-based patient-trial matching systems present a transformative opportunity to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of clinical trial recruitment. Despite current limitations related to model generalizability, explainability, and data constraints, future advancements in hybrid modeling strategies, domain-specific fine-tuning, and real-world data set integration could further optimize LLM-based trial matching. Addressing these challenges will be crucial to realizing the full potential of LLMs in streamlining patient recruitment and accelerating clinical trial execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.