Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489722›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025

Enhancing Patient-Trial Matching With Large Language Models: A Scoping Review of Emerging Applications and Approaches.

Hongyu Chen, Xiaohan Li, Xing He, Aokun Chen, James McGill, Emily C Webber, Hua Xu, Mei Liu, Jiang Bian

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Translating evidence into practice: adapting TrialGPT for real-world clinical trial eligibility screening.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hongyu ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-0833
Xiaohan LiDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0009-0004-6679-5560
Xing HeDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-8058
Aokun ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-5100-3821
James McGillIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0003-0588-5680
Emily C WebberRiley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Hua XuSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, Yale, NH.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4672
Mei LiuDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-8036-2110
Jiang BianDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5429

Funding

ACTS (AD Clinical Trial Simulation): Developing Advanced Informatics Approaches for an Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial Simulation SystemR01AG084236 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Jiang Bian, Cui Tao · 2023 to 2026
$4.1M
Eligibility criteria design for Alzheimer's trials with real-world data and explainable AIR01AG080991 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jiang Bian, Fei Wang · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080991NIA NIH HHS R01 AG084236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient recruitment remains a major bottleneck in clinical trial execution, with inefficient patient-trial matching often causing delays and failures. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for automating and improving this process. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging applications of LLMs in patient-trial matching.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and OpenAlex for literature published between December 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024. Studies were included if they explicitly integrated LLMs into patient-trial matching systems. Data extraction focused on system architectures, patient data processing, eligibility criteria processing, matching techniques, evaluation metrics, and performance.

resultsOf the 2,357 studies initially identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria. The majority (21/24) were published in 2024, highlighting the rapid adoption of LLMs in this domain. Most systems used patient-centric matching (17/24), with OpenAI's generative pretrained transformer models being the most commonly used LLM. Core components of these systems included eligibility criteria processing, patient data processing, and matching, with some incorporating retrieval algorithms to enhance computational efficiency. LLM-integrated approaches demonstrated improved accuracy and scalability in patient-trial matching, although challenges such as performance variability, interpretability, and reliance on synthetic data sets remain significant.

conclusionLLM-based patient-trial matching systems present a transformative opportunity to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of clinical trial recruitment. Despite current limitations related to model generalizability, explainability, and data constraints, future advancements in hybrid modeling strategies, domain-specific fine-tuning, and real-world data set integration could further optimize LLM-based trial matching. Addressing these challenges will be crucial to realizing the full potential of LLMs in streamlining patient recruitment and accelerating clinical trial execution.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionHumansLanguageLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40489722
PMCPMC12169815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.