ArticleNeurology2025
Treatment Patterns and Disease Burden of Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis in the United States: A Cohort Study Using Health Care Claims Databases.
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Characteristics and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Initiating Rozanolixizumab: A US Claims Database Analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Experience Using Efgartigimod to Treat Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Treatment patterns, intensive treatment, and hospitalization-related burden of juvenile generalized myasthenia gravis in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a hospital-based claims database.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Personalized Management and Timing of Thymectomy in Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Routine Clinical Scale Use in a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort-A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesJuvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is a rare disorder defined as MG in patients younger than 18 years. Generalized JMG is more common in postpubertal than prepubertal patients. There are no formal international JMG treatment guidelines, and knowledge on treatment patterns and disease burden is limited. The aim of this study was to describe treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HCRU) for patients with JMG and explore differences in disease presentation between prepubertal-onset (younger than 12 years) and postpubertal-onset (12-17 years) patients.
methodsPatients with JMG, newly diagnosed from 2008 to 2021, were identified from the US Merative MarketScan® Research Databases. Patients were followed from the first JMG claim (diagnosis/treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, immunoglobulin [Ig], or plasma exchange [PLEX]). The primary outcome was JMG-related treatment changes during follow-up, assessed descriptively. Rates of MG exacerbation, thymectomy, and acute intravenous immunoglobulin/PLEX treatment were assessed. HCRU was evaluated.
resultsA total of 630 patients (64.1% female; mean [SD] age 9.07 [5.73] years; 57.6% prepubertal onset) were followed for a median (range) of 2.4 (0-13) years. Corticosteroids were started at a median (range) of 1.28 (0-37.02) and 3.19 (0-87.68) months from diagnosis for postpubertal-onset and prepubertal-onset patients, respectively. The rate of thymectomy was highest during treatment with maintenance Ig/PLEX (incidence rate [IR]; [95% CI] per 100 patient-years: 34.62 [14.41-83.17] for postpubertal-onset and 24.24 [9.10-64.60] for prepubertal-onset patients). MG exacerbations were most frequent during the first year of follow-up in both subgroups (34.1% and 30.3%). In postpubertal-onset patients, exacerbation was highest during treatment with maintenance Ig/PLEX and nonsteroid immunosuppressant therapy ([NSIST], mostly polytherapy) (IR [95% CI] 105.81 [68.99-162.29] and 91.22 [65.80-126.47]). For prepubertal-onset patients, exacerbation was most frequent during NSIST (polytherapy) and biologic treatment (IR [95% CI] 140.44 [115.45-170.85] and 142.95 [46.10-443.23]). JMG-related hospitalizations occurred in 36.0% and 30.0% of postpubertal-onset and prepubertal-onset patients, in the first year of follow-up. DISCUSSION: Patients with JMG escalated rapidly through the treatment hierarchy. Postpubertal-onset patients escalated more quickly to later-line treatments than prepubertal-onset patients. However, some patients continued to experience high HCRU, highlighting the need for new JMG treatments to provide rapid disease control. A limitation is that treatment escalation reasons were not evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.