Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489673›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment cycles and rates of flare in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-a tale of Sisyphean endeavour?

Emily Bugeja, Georgina Tiller, William Renton, Jane Munro, Peter Gowdie, Angela Cox, Roger Allen, Jo Buckle, Jonathan Akikusa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily BugejaRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Georgina TillerRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
William RentonRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jane MunroRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter GowdieRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Angela CoxRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Roger AllenRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jo BuckleRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jonathan AkikusaRheumatology Service, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWithdrawal of DMARD therapy to determine need for ongoing medication is common in JIA management. Little is known about how often patients undergo trials of medication discontinuation or the outcomes of successive trials. This study examined DMARD treatment cycles in a JIA cohort to determine how frequently medication withdrawal trials occur over follow-up and if relapse rates change over consecutive cycles.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of longitudinal cohort data of children with DMARD-treated JIA diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Extracted data included demographics, DMARD therapy details and clinical assessments including active joint count, date of last follow-up and disease status at that time. Data were collected to January 2024.

resultsNinety-one children were studied. Median age was 10.1 years (range 1.5-16.8), 59% were female and median follow-up was 7.0 years (range 0.7-13). A maximum of four cycles of DMARD treatment were undertaken. Forty-four percent of children underwent more than one cycle; 63.5% relapsed after their first cycle and 53.3% after their second; and 25.3% remained off treatment to last follow-up following cycle 1, and over two subsequent cycles of therapy this increased to just 35.2%.

conclusionIn JIA patients requiring DMARD therapy, recurrent treatment withdrawal trials are common over follow-up, but relapse risk is high and remains so over successive trials. Permanent treatment withdrawal is therefore not a realistic goal for most patients with therapies currently available. Until biomarkers of permanent remission are developed, strategies to minimize both drug toxicity and the risk of disease flares in patients with recurrently active disease after medication withdrawal are required.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSymptom Flare UpWithholding TreatmentAntirheumatic AgentscohortDMARDJIAoutcometherapy cyclestreatment withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID40489673
PMCPMC12494217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.