ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of emancipative values on life satisfaction across different levels of democracy: A cross-national analysis of the World Values Survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emancipative values - advocating for personal freedoms, equality, and autonomy - are theorized to enhance life satisfaction by fostering empowerment and opportunities. The current study tested whether their impact is context-dependent, influenced by societal norms and institutional frameworks. We used data from wave seven of the World Values Survey (WVS) and the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset, covering diverse countries and time periods. We examined the interaction between emancipative values and a country's level of liberal democracy on life satisfaction using a random effects model accounting for country-level variations (random intercept and slope). The model was adjusted for individual-level variables, such as settlement size, income, and educational attainment, as well as country-level factors like lagged income per capita and regional affiliation. This approach allowed us to investigate the direct effect of emancipative values across different democratic contexts. Our final dataset included N = 76,702 participants across 58 countries. Countries with the highest levels of liberal democracy were also the most economically prosperous. Individuals in democratic nations were older, resided predominantly in larger settlements, demonstrated the highest levels of educational attainment, reported the highest incomes, and expressed the strongest adherence to emancipative values. Our random effect model revealed a negative main effect of emancipative values on life satisfaction. A significant positive interaction between democracy and emancipative values was also identified. Less democratic countries demonstrated a negative effect of emancipative values while no significant effect was observed in more democratic contexts. Overall, our study challenges the notion that emancipative values universally enhance life satisfaction, highlighting the significance of cultural and institutional congruence in assessing how personal values affect well-being. These findings emphasize the importance of considering contextual factors when examining the relationship between individual values and life satisfaction across diverse political and cultural landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.