ArticlePloS one2025
In silico analysis of quorum sensing modulators: Insights into molecular docking and dynamics and potential therapeutic applications.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- In Silico Approaches Targeting Quorum-Sensing Inhibition inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Computational Modeling and MM-PBSA-Based Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Unexplored tRNA Isoleucine Lysidine Synthetase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Hyperbranched Amoxicilloyl-Poly-L-Lysine.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Article
- Phytochemical Quorum-Sensing Inhibitors Against Bacterial Pathogens: Mechanisms of Action and Translational Challenges.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Unsupervised synchronization of molecular dynamics trajectories via graph embedding and time warping.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A novel SaeS-targeting antivirulence antagonist screened against methicillin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quorum sensing (QS) regulates bacterial functions like virulence and biofilm formation, mediated by proteins such as LasI and QscR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study investigates the structural dynamics of LasI and QscR proteins in complex with Sulfamerazine and Sulfaperin, using AiiA lactonase as a negative control, through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify potential QS modulators. Molecular docking and MD simulations assessed binding affinity and structural dynamics, analyzing parameters like docking scores, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), radius of gyration (Rg), principal component analysis (PCA), and covariance analysis. Sulfamerazine exhibited the highest binding affinity for LasI based on docking scores, indicating strong ligand-protein interactions. MD simulations revealed stability in the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, with lower RMSD compared to LasI-Sulfaperin and QscR complexes. RMSF analysis indicated greater flexibility in ligand-binding regions of LasI-Sulfaperin and QscR complexes, suggesting weaker binding. SASA showed a decrease in solvent-accessible surface area for the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, supporting a compact structure. Rg values confirmed this, with the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex being more compact (~2.00 nm) than QscR-ligand complexes (2.10-2.30 nm). PCA revealed significant conformational changes in the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, with PC1 explaining 57.26% variance. Covariance analysis indicated stronger residue coupling in the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, suggesting higher rigidity, while LasI-Sulfaperin and QscR complexes exhibited flexible dynamics. AiiA lactonase was used as a negative control due to its established quorum quenching activity, which hydrolyzes AHL molecules and disrupts QS signaling. Unlike LasI and QscR, AiiA does not rely on small molecule binding for activation. However, a known LasI or QscR inhibitor would have served as a more appropriate positive control, which will be considered in future studies. These findings suggest the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex's stability and rigidity make Sulfamerazine a promising QS modulator. Computational analyses highlight its potential to disrupt bacterial communication. Further experimental validation is needed to confirm its therapeutic implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.