ArticlePloS one2025
Genetic analysis and functional assessment of a TGFBR2 variant in micrognathia and cleft palate.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Hesperidin on the Healing Process of Cleft Lip Surgical Wounds in Rats: A Histological Evaluation and Therapeutic Analysis.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2025Article
- Dmxl1 is required for survival in the mouse to organogenesis stages of development.Differentiation; research in biological diversityArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cleft lip and cleft palate are among the most common congenital anomalies and are the result of incomplete fusion of embryonic craniofacial processes or palatal shelves, respectively. We know that genetics play a large role in these anomalies but the list of known causal genes is far from complete. As part of a larger sequencing effort of patients with congenital craniofacial anomalies, we identified a rare candidate variant in transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (TGFBR2). This variant alters a highly conserved amino acid and is predicted to be pathogenic by a number of metrics. The family history and population genetics suggest that this specific variant would be incompletely penetrant, but this gene has been convincingly implicated in craniofacial development. In order to test the hypothesis this might be a causal variant, we used genome editing to create the orthologous variant in a new mouse model. Surprisingly, Tgfbr2V387M mice did not exhibit craniofacial anomalies or have reduced survival, suggesting Tgfbr2V387M is not a causal variant for cleft palate/ micrognathia. The discrepancy between in silico predictions and mouse phenotypes highlights the complexity of translating human genetic findings to mouse models. We expect these findings will aid in interpretation of future variants seen in TGFBR2 from ongoing sequencing of patients with congenital craniofacial anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.