ArticlePloS one2025
Cardiovascular disease risk among Australian unpaid carers - A survival analysis using 15 waves of the HILDA survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEngaging in chronically stressful behaviours has been hypothesised to increase the risk of experiencing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Providing unpaid care is known to be a stressful activity, but it is not clear whether this caregiving is associated with CVD. This study filled a gap in the existing literature by examining the association between providing unpaid care and incident cardiovascular disease among a nationally representative sample of Australian adults.
methods11,123 adult participants aged over 18 years from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey were followed for up to 14 years from baseline (2003) until 2017. Gender-stratified survival analysis models used self-reported caregiving and heart disease statuses as well as time-varying covariates, to assess the association between providing high-intensity or low-intensity unpaid care (to an elderly or disabled relative) and incident CVD in comparison with a non-caregiving control.
resultsAmong females, there was weak evidence that CVD was associated with high-intensity unpaid care (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = [0.83, 1.95]) and no evidence for low-intensity unpaid care (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = [0.50, 1.26]) in comparison with non-carers after adjusting for confounders. There was no association between caregiving and incident CVD for high-intensity (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.47, 1.42]) or low-intensity (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = [0.55, 1.28]) caregiving males in the adjusted models.
conclusionsThese findings do not provide strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that providing unpaid care does not increase risk of developing CVD in the Australian population. Given that these findings are somewhat inconsistent with the extant literature from other populations, further research is necessary, both in Australia and internationally, to build on the findings of this study and improve understanding of the nature of the association between caregiving and incident CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.