Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489477›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes.

Braeden A Terpou, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Ruoxi Wang, Danielle Martin, Mina Tadrous, Sacha Bhatia, Jennifer Shuldiner, Simon Berthelot, Niels Thakkar, Kerry McBrien and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Braeden A TerpouInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2715
Lauren Lapointe-ShawDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruoxi WangInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle MartinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sacha BhatiaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer ShuldinerWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon BerthelotDépartement de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine D'urgence, Université Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-0586
Niels ThakkarCollege of Nurses of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry McBrienDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bahram RahmanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-0894
J Michael PatersonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-1714
Rita McCrackenDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-0364
Christine SalahubToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara KiranInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah M IversInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435
Laura DesveauxInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walk-in clinics (WICs), appreciated for their accessibility and convenience, have become an increasingly popular healthcare option in Ontario for patients with and without primary care enrolment. Despite their utility, WICs face criticism for delivering lower-quality care compared to comprehensive, enrolment-based primary care models. Critics argue that WICs contribute to system inefficiencies and encourage practice patterns misaligned with population health goals. This study explored physician perspectives on two key outcomes often associated with low-quality care in WICs: repeat primary care visits and potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Ontario-based family physicians (N = 19) who had experience practicing in both WICs and enrolment-based primary care. The findings highlight systemic challenges, including limited access to enrolment-based primary care and increasing healthcare demands, which have pushed WICs beyond their intended role. This misalignment has created tensions between their structure and purpose, resulting in visits that participants described as more transactional than those in primary care. These constraints-rooted in a lack of informational and relational continuity-often limited participants' ability to provide in-depth engagement or follow-up care. Repeat visits were frequently linked to efforts to ensure continuity for complex or chronic conditions. Similarly, participants acknowledged the reality of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, attributing it to the high patient volume, desire to satisfy patient expectations, and a tendency to "err on the side of caution" when the nature of the illness is in question. The findings underscore how health system pressures and well-intended policies, such as Ontario's primary care access bonus, can produce unintended consequences, including inequities in access and difficulties with care coordination across settings. Addressing these challenges requires reforms to better integrate WICs with the primary care system, alongside tailored training to support physician decision-making in episodic care contexts.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareQuality of Health CareAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40489477
PMCPMC12148145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.