ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Changes of respiratory microbiota associated with prognosis in pulmonary infection patients with invasive mechanical ventilation-supported respiratory failure.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors Analysis and Nomogram Prediction Model Construction for Pulmonary Infection After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory failure (RF) is an important cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality due to respiratory diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) testing in pathogen diagnosis, medication guidance and to explore dynamic changes in the respiratory microbiota associated with prognosis.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study enrolled ICU patients from five hospitals who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and had pathogenic microorganisms identified by both mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) from December 2021 to April 2024. Patients were classified into two groups based on discharge outcomes: survivors (
resultsCompared with the survivors, non-survivors had a significantly higher proportion of smokers, dyspnea, type I RF, blood urea nitrogen, and C-reactive protein (
conclusionsmNGS is a promising method for identifying pathogens in pulmonary infections in IMV-supported RF patients and for exploring changes in lung microbial composition to provide a reference for patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.