Use of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at National, Regional, and State Levels.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Suicide Prevention and the Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of Bangladesh.Public health challenges · 2026
   Article
2. Crisis Phone Services.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
   Review
3. Implementation of Safety Planning at 988 Crisis Centers in Missouri: A Mixed Methods Study.Research square · 2025
   Article
4. Financing Factors Perceived as Affecting the Implementation and Future Success of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.