ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
New Checkbox, Now What? A Scoping Review to Guide Health Research among Middle Eastern and North African Communities.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrior to March 2024, Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) individuals in the United States (US) were overlooked in the health literature. This scoping review aims to clarify current knowledge across domains of physical and mental health conditions, risk factors, and preventive/screening behaviors among MENA populations. It also provides a road map for advancing MENA health research and enabling valid and reliable comparisons to the health of White and other minority populations.
methodsThe authors adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to compile the existing health research. They used PubMed®, EMBASE®, and CINAHL® with an end search date of July 5, 2023. The final search yielded 1826 records, of which 510 articles met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentages) were calculated.
findingsApproximately 79% of the studies collected primary data and 75% were cross-sectional. Thirty-eight percent of the studies included Somalis, 29% Iraqis, and 18% Syrians. Thirty-one percent of the studies were conducted in Michigan, 17% in Minnesota, and 11% in California. The conditions that received the most attention in each domain were stress and trauma (approximately 11% each), infectious diseases (9.2%), cancer screening (6.1%), and diet (4.5%).
conclusionsThis review lays the groundwork for more accurate representation, improved surveillance, and the development of targeted interventions that promote health equity for MENA populations. The findings underscore the need for all organizations that collect race and ethnicity data to integrate MENA-specific identifiers into their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.