ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Disproportionality analyses of Tapinarof-related adverse events based on the FAERS database.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The real-world safety evaluation of the selective NaV1.8 inhibitor suzetrigine: disproportionality analysis and flexible empirical bayes signals from FAERS with external triangulation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Disproportionality analysis of methylphenidate-associated adverse events in pediatric patients using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: overall signals and stratification by gender and dosage form.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTapinarof, a novel topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) modulator, has demonstrated promising therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. However, its comprehensive safety profile in real-world settings remains underexplored.
objectiveTo assess the post-marketing safety of Tapinarof using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with a focus on identifying significant adverse event (AE) signals and subgroup-specific risks.
methodsA retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted on FAERS data from Q2 2022 to Q4 2024. Reports listing Tapinarof as the primary suspect drug were extracted and analyzed using four established signal detection algorithms (ROR, PRR, EBGM, IC), complemented by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsA total of 1,227 AE reports were included. The majority of reports originated from adults aged 18-64 years and were submitted by healthcare professionals, with a balanced male-to-female ratio. The most frequently observed AE signals were related to skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, including keratosis pilaris, contact dermatitis, and application site acne. Notable signals were also detected for infections (e.g., pustules) and hypersensitivity reactions. A novel tumor-related signal was identified for keratoacanthoma, with statistically significant associations also observed for squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Gender subgroup analysis revealed a higher incidence of dermatological AEs in females and slightly stronger neoplasm-related signals in males. Age, weight, and indication data were largely missing, limiting subgroup-specific interpretation.
conclusionTapinarof is generally well tolerated in adults, particularly for psoriasis treatment, but is associated with strong cutaneous and immune-related AE signals. Novel findings-including pharyngeal swelling and tumor-related events-warrant heightened clinical vigilance, especially in patients requiring long-term or large-area application. Gender differences in AE reporting further underscore the need for personalized risk management strategies. Further longitudinal and mechanistic studies are essential to confirm these associations and guide safer clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.