Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488872›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

The effect of symptom duration on the outcomes of lumbar discectomy for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen Xian Low, Arjan Sehmbi, Farzad Shabani, Nitin Shetty, Saeed Mohammad, Hasan Raza Mohammad

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wen Xian LowBarts Bone and Joint Health, London, UK.
Arjan SehmbiBarts Bone and Joint Health, London, UK.
Farzad ShabaniBarking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nitin ShettyWhittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Saeed MohammadNorthern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Hasan Raza MohammadBarts Bone and Joint Health, London, UK. hasan.mohammad@qmul.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain, often resulting from degenerative disc disease, affects up to 80% of the population at some point in their lives. The impact of preoperative radicular pain duration on discectomy outcomes remains inconclusive. We aim to compare the outcomes of lumbar discectomy for patients with different symptom durations to determine the optimal timing of surgery.

methodsMedline, Embase, and Central databases were searched for studies comparing the outcomes of discectomy in patients with different durations of radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Cutoffs at three months (very early), six months (early), and after 12 months (delayed) were selected based on pilot searches for symptom durations comparisons. Mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differerences (SMD) were calculated using the inverse-variance method, and risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

results29 studies with a total of 23,550 patients were included in this study. No statistically significant differences were found in the postoperative improvement in back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or one-year reoperation rate for all of the cutoffs used (three months, six months, and 12 months). Sensitivity analyses found significant improvement in leg pain for symptom durations of < 12 months compared to > 12 months (SMD = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.11; 0.41, p = 0.02), which equates to a score of 1 point on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Existing studies suffer from high risk of bias, inconsistent outcome measures, and varied timepoint assessment postoperatively.

conclusionsThere is low quality evidence suggesting that discectomy within 12 months of symptom onset can improve postoperative leg pain. There was no significant effect of symptom duration on postoperative back pain, disability, quality of life and reoperation risk. As a precaution, we recommend surgeons to operate within 12 months of symptom onset after a trial of nonoperative management has failed. We recommend the collection of discectomy outcomes in national registry programmes for detailed assessment of factors affecting postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

DiskectomyIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeRadiculopathyHumansTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeDiscectomyLower back painLumbar disc herniationSciaticaSpine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.