Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488866›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2025

Alternating self-administration sessions of cocaine and heroin impact drug-related motivation and vocalisations in rats.

Kristian Adamatzky, Angharad C Collins, Aldo Badiani, Bryan F Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristian AdamatzkySchool of Psychology, Sussex Neuroscience, Sussex Addiction Research & Intervention Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Angharad C CollinsSchool of Psychology, Sussex Neuroscience, Sussex Addiction Research & Intervention Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Aldo BadianiSchool of Psychology, Sussex Neuroscience, Sussex Addiction Research & Intervention Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Bryan F SingerSchool of Psychology, Sussex Neuroscience, Sussex Addiction Research & Intervention Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK. b.f.singer@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3474-6137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAnimal models of addiction often study changes in motivation after repeated self-administration of a single drug. However, human users frequently consume multiple drugs, potentially altering their motivation and affective response.

objectivesThis study investigated how individual rats differentially self-administer cocaine and heroin, and whether motivation to take each drug was associated with affective states, as indicated by ultrasonic vocalisations (USVs). We also determined whether opioid antagonism (via naltrexone), which is known to decrease heroin-taking and associated USVs, also altered motivation and vocalisations for cocaine.

methodsMale Lister Hooded rats, with surgically implanted catheters, self-administered cocaine and heroin on alternating days. Motivation was evaluated via drug intake escalation (fixed-ratio schedule), behavioural adaptation to dose reductions (behavioural economics), and progressive ratio breakpoints (with or without naltrexone). USVs were recorded and analysed using machine learning software (DeepSqueak).

resultsRats escalated intake of both drugs during training. At the start of each session, rats rapidly self-administered cocaine or heroin; this drug-loading behaviour was associated with an increase in 50 kHz vocalisations. Rats altered their cocaine and heroin intake when drug doses decreased, and this was accompanied by reduced 50 kHz USVs. Lastly, naltrexone reduced progressive ratio breakpoints for heroin but not cocaine; naltrexone also decreased 50 kHz USVs for heroin (an effect which persisted).

conclusionsDistinct patterns emerged in motivation and USVs between cocaine and heroin self-administration. Notably, USV frequency did not consistently align with motivation, especially when drug dosage changed. Future research may clarify this divergence.

Indexed as

CocaineHeroinMotivationVocalization, AnimalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsRatsSelf AdministrationCocaineHeroinNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsAddictionBehavioural economicsCocaineDiamorphine hydrochlorideHeroinMotivationNaltrexoneProgressive ratioSelf-administrationUSV

Identifiers

PMID40488866
PMCPMC12675567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.