ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Two decades of loneliness among children and adolescents: longitudinal trends, risks and resources - Results from the German BELLA and COPSY studies.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms linking family socioeconomic status to children's depressive symptoms: a longitudinal moderated mediation analysis.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
- Current global crises and youth mental health in Germany: the role of media use, coping and resources.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- A study of the associations between social isolation and loneliness with sex-specific cancer risk in the UK Biobank.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping loneliness prevention and alleviation interventions: a comparative survey of Basel, Bern, Zurich, and Dublin.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness among young people is a significant public health concern, yet research on its prevalence, longitudinal trends, and associated risk and resource factors in Germany remains limited. This paper draws on two German longitudinal panel surveys with refreshment sampling – the BELLA study (2003–2017) and the subsequent COPSY study (2020–2024), and includes ten nationwide measurement points. The sample comprised N = 3,043 participants (49.9% female; age range 11–17 years) from the BELLA study, and N = 1,909 participants (51.0% female; age range 11–17 years) from the COPSY study. Our findings indicate that loneliness rates remained relatively stable between 2003 and 2017 (9.5–15.5%) but spiked dramatically in 2020 (34.6%) during the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, 20.5% of young people still reported feeling lonely at least sometimes during the past week. Consistently, girls were more likely to report loneliness than boys. Mixed model panel regression analyses identified key risk factors for loneliness, like female gender, screen time, parental mental illness, as well as mental and physical health complaints in children and adolescents. In contrast, personal, familial, and social resources were associated with lower levels of loneliness. While some degree of loneliness is a common experience in youth, persistent loneliness poses a risk to mental and physical health. Our findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, particularly in school, leisure, and family settings, where social and emotional skills can be fostered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.