ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Reliability and applicability of the
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic, self-reported fatigue in adult immunotherapy patients and healthy controls: No association with cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Interocular symmetry in dynamic retinal vessel analysis among healthy adults.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- Acute effects of high-intensity interval training on retinal microvascular circulation in cancer patients and healthy controls: insight from the optical coherence tomography angiography.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to examine the reliability and applicability of the
methodsPatients receiving ICI therapy (n = 13, 46 ± 15 y, BMI = 24.3 ± 2.6) and age-matched controls (n = 13, 47 ± 18 y, BMI = 24.9 ± 4.5) completed all study procedures. Following medical clearance, they performed a ramp CPET on a cycle ergometer until task failure. During the second visit, they completed three consecutive step-transition tests: 6 min at 20 W, followed by 6 min at 90% of gas exchange threshold (GET), and continuing to 30-min constant-load cycling, with gas exchange and cardiovascular responses constantly monitored.
resultsThe control group reached ~ 30% higher peak power output, resulting in higher peak values of minute ventilation (
conclusionsApparently, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.