ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Acute Lymphoid Leukemia: Is Transplant Indicated for Philadelphia Chromosome Positive ALL?
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is a distinct subtype of ALL that has historically been associated with a very poor prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has improved the 5-year overall survival rate to approximately 44% and has been considered the only potentially curative treatment option for these patients. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represented a breakthrough in the management of Ph+ ALL, significantly improving patient outcomes. Imatinib, the first-generation TKI, led to high complete remission (CR) rates when added to induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Next-generation TKIs, such as dasatinib and ponatinib, have also demonstrated remarkably high CR rates, even when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy or steroids. The advent of immunotherapies, including inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, was another major milestone in Ph+ ALL treatment. The combination of TKIs with immunotherapy appears to be an optimal therapeutic strategy. Given the efficacy of these chemotherapy-free approaches, the role of alloHSCT in Ph+ ALL needs to be reassessed. Patients treated with next-generation TKIs, particularly in combination with novel immunotherapies, may achieve durable remissions without the need for alloHSCT, provided they do not harbour additional adverse cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities and achieve a deep response following induction and consolidation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.