ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Use of Measurable Residual Disease to Improve Outcomes.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment following initial therapy attempts to detect low levels of leukemia cells that remain undetectable by conventional cytomorphological methods. MRD-negativity after induction therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is strongly associated with improved disease-free and overall survival, making results of MRD testing a more reliable indicator of treatment response compared to traditional methods. Unfortunately, due in part to genetic and phenotypical heterogeneity, no perfect MRD assay for AML currently exists although multiple tests are currently in use. Understanding the performance characteristics of AML MRD tests is critical for their clinical use. After achieving first complete remission with chemotherapy, consolidation therapy aims to deepen remission and prolong response duration. For patients with difficult-to-treat AML, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a key strategy for achieving durable remission. However, for patients with a relatively favorable risk profile, the benefits of allo-SCT may not outweigh its risks, and durable remission can often be achieved with chemotherapy alone. When the benefits of allo-SCT are less clear, MRD can refine patient selection. MRD assessment after induction chemotherapy using validated methods can signal the need for more aggressive or alternative treatments to mitigate relapse risk. MRD-negative patients eligible for transplantation might benefit from reduced treatment intensity or modified conditioning to avoid overtreatment. Additionally, MRD can guide the intensity of conditioning therapy in transplant-eligible patients. Post-transplant MRD monitoring can further identify patients who may benefit from preemptive treatments to maintain remission. Integrating MRD into treatment protocols allows clinicians to enhance therapeutic precision, optimize patient outcomes, and improve the likelihood of achieving long-term remission in AML. However, due to limitations associated with current AML MRD testing, careful consideration and validation are essential before incorporating MRD findings into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.