Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488823›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Conditioning Regimen Options.

Zheng-Li Xu, Xiao-Jun Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zheng-Li XuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Jun HuangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China. xjhrm@medmail.com.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), the conditioning regimen plays a crucial role in the transplantation process, aiming to eliminate any leukemia cells and suppress the recipient's immune system to promote engraftment. Conditioning regimens are categorized into myeloablative (MAC), non-myeloablative (NMA), and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) based on their intensity. The choice of regimen depends on disease type, patient age, comorbidities, and donor source. The conditioning regimens vary between matched sibling donors and alternative donors. In haploidentical transplantation, the mainstream non-T cell depletion protocols included the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy)-based strategies. In hematologic non-malignancies such as aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, and thalassemia, the tailored conditioning regimens are crucial for improving outcomes. The diversified and personalized conditioning regimens are the future direction in the field of transplantation. Future directions may include integrating new targeted therapies and immunotherapies into conditioning regimens to further optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningCyclophosphamideGraft vs Host DiseaseGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsTransplantation, HomologousCyclophosphamideGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorImmunosuppressive AgentsATGConditioning regimenG-CSFIntensityPTCy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.