ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Adults.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-diseases that disproportionately affect older adults. Yet historically, older adults were excluded from HCT given its high morbidity and mortality and their increased susceptibility to these outcomes. This created a vast disparity: Those most often affected by AML and MDS were not considered eligible for its cure. Fortunately, clinicians have increasingly recognized that geriatric, functional, and frailty assessments, rather than chronological age alone, may help to identify older adults who are "fit" for HCT. This change in practice accompanied by the advent of azacitidine/venetoclax, which induces disease remission in a greater number of older adults, has led to the implementation of HCT in a wider population of patients than ever before. Moreover, improvements to HCT platforms, including reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), abatacept, and the increasing use of unrelated and HLA-mismatched donors, have all contributed to the increased adoption and safety of HCT in adults up to 75 years old. In fact, select centers have extended the age of HCT eligibility up to the eighth decade. Herein, we review the data regarding the safety of existing platforms, the unique challenges inherent to HCT in older adults, and the efforts to optimize outcomes. Ultimately, in the modern era of HCT, age may, in fact, just be a number.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.