ArticleMolecular biomedicine2025
Application of multigene panel testing for bleeding, thrombotic, and platelet disorders in patients and the general population in China.
Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular diagnosis of inherited platelet disorders: a tale of two realities - advanced vs. resource-limited setting.Thrombosis journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bleeding, thrombotic, and platelet disorders (BTPDs) are rare but complex conditions with diverse clinical presentations that often delay accurate diagnosis. In this study, we developed an Expanded Thrombohemostasis (ExTH) gene panel comprising 130 diagnostic and risk-associated genes. This panel was applied to 747 patients and 760 controls, representing the largest genetic screening study for BTPDs in an Asian population to date. A high overall diagnostic yield of 54.8% was achieved, with mutation carriers exhibiting more severe clinical phenotypes. Notably, the diagnostic rate was significantly higher in younger individuals, underscoring the clinical value of early genetic screening. Beyond traditional Tier 1 gene panels, we identified disease-causing variants in unexpected categories in 4.28% of patients, revealing extensive genotype-phenotype overlap and advocating for a broader diagnostic approach. Some pathogenic variants exhibited normal results in conventional coagulation assays, highlighting the limitations of standard functional testing in detecting underlying genetic causes. These findings establish the ExTH gene panel as a powerful tool for comprehensive genetic diagnosis, capable of capturing clinically relevant variants that would be missed by conventional approaches. This study provides new insight into the molecular landscape of BTPDs, and supports the integration of broad gene panel testing into routine clinical workflows to improve diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.