ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Vas Guide: a novel device for looping blood vessels in robot-assisted surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLooping blood vessels in robot-assisted surgery remains challenging because of limitations in instrument articulation, joint length, and the lack of tactile feedback. To address this critical issue, we developed the Vas Guide, a novel device, for safe blood vessel handling. This study aims to establish the efficacy, safety, and durability of the Vas Guide.
methodsThe Vas Guide is a flat, curved stainless-steel strip with blunt, rounded ends and a hole near the distal end. After sufficient dissection of the posterior surface of the target blood vessel, the Vas Guide with a vessel loop tied to the distal end was passed around the blood vessel in a single step using a suturing-like motion, thereby enabling secure vessel management. It is reusable and has a unit price of approximately $600. We analyzed 83 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy at Tokushima University Hospital: 39 in the Vas Guide group and 44 in the conventional group. Outcomes including looping time, looping-related complication rates, such as collisions between instruments and bleeding, and additional instrument usage were recorded. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA-TLX) scores were assessed.
resultsThe patients' characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The Vas Guide group demonstrated significantly better outcomes, including faster looping times (31 vs. 90 s, p < 0.001), fewer looping-related complications (0% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), no additional instrument usage (0% vs. 50%, p < 0.001), and better NASA-TLX scores (26.5 vs. 75.7, p < 0.001). The Vas Guide showed no usability issues, with only minor surface scratches and a slight radius change (8.60 mm to 8.69 mm).
conclusionThis reusable device combines high efficacy, safety, and durability and can be implemented at a relatively low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40488770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.