ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Supervised and unsupervised rehabilitation of visual field defect: cohort investigation of eye movement training at a clinical setting and at home.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventions for Visual Field Loss After Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lesions along the visual pathways can lead to areas of blindness, which can extend to an entire hemifield (hemianopia). Hemianopic patients often have abnormal eye-movements which hampers their interaction with their immediate surrounds, adversely affecting their quality of life. Compensatory rehabilitation techniques are aimed at improving eye-movement efficacy enabling patients to make better use of their sighted field to compensate for the sight loss. NeuroEyeCoach (NEC) is a compensatory vision therapy that can be accessed at home and is effective in improving visual search performance and reducing perceived disability. We have compared objective and subjective assessments of visual function before and after vision rehabilitation in a cohort of patients that accessed NEC at home (N = 95) and a group of patients that completed the training under clinical supervision in a rehabilitation clinic (N = 31). Use of NEC led to improvements in both objective measures of visual function such as reduced visual search times, lower search errors, and faster completion of a cancellation task as well as reduced subjective reports of disability. The objective measures showed a larger improvement in those undergoing rehabilitation in the clinic settings compared to the home cohort, nevertheless, there was no cohort x training interaction for perceived improvements in subjective reports of disability. This indicates no significant differences on the effect of training on activities of daily living between the groups. The findings demonstrate that compensatory eye movement training is an effective tool for rehabilitation of vision loss when used in clinical settings or accessed remotely from home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.