Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488741›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2025

Why Has Biomarker-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Sepsis Not Been Implemented in Clinical Practice?

Sanne Ter Horst, Jan C Ter Maaten, Matijs van Meurs, Jill Moser, Hjalmar R Bouma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanne Ter HorstDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9855-2919
Jan C Ter MaatenDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matijs van MeursDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jill MoserDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar R BoumaDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a dysregulated, potentially fatal host response to infection, characterized by heterogeneity in clinical presentation and organ failure mechanisms. Early hemodynamic resuscitation and antibiotics are crucial treatments. Current guidelines recommend a one-size-fits-all approach of 30 mL/kg fluids, which may worsen vascular leakage and organ dysfunction in some patients. Personalized strategies using biomarkers and dynamic fluid responsiveness assessments offer a more tailored approach, potentially preventing fluid overload while ensuring perfusion. A recent multiomics analysis identified sepsis subgroups benefiting from either liberal or restrictive fluid resuscitation, highlighting -omics' potential in personalized fluid management and the role of immune regulation and endothelial dysfunction in septic shock. Despite progress, methodological challenges hinder clinical implementation of biomarkers. Addressing issues like rapid point-of-care biomarker assays already at emergency department or ICU admission, standardizing sepsis diagnosis, robust external validation, and clinical trial enrichment is crucial for advancing biomarker-guided fluid management in clinical settings.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFluid TherapyResuscitationSepsisHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicShock, SepticBiomarkersbiomarkerfluid resuscitationpersonalized medicinesepsis

Identifiers

PMID40488741
PMCPMC12151020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.