ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Communication Dynamics Between Professional Nursing Organisations and Their Stakeholders: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opinion Leadership among Nurses in Public Debate: Moral Conviction, Credibility, and Collective Support.Policy, politics & nursing practice · 2026Article
- Public representations of the nursing image in YouTube comments: analysis based on Jean Watson's theory.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Public Perceptions of Nurses in Argentina. A Cross-Sectional Study.International nursing review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunicating a clear, authentic and socially coherent image among nurses and their associations is essential because it helps shape an accurate perception of their role in society. Thus, although each nurse plays a crucial role individually, real transformation in the public perception of the profession requires coordinated and strategic actions by the organisations representing them.
objectiveThis study explored existing knowledge on how nursing colleges, professional associations and unions communicate with their stakeholders.
methodsA scoping review was performed following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Eight electronic databases were searched, including CINAHL, Cochrane, Dialnet, Scopus, Scielo, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science for both peer-reviewed articles and grey literature (e.g., reports, policy documents), using both MeSH terms and keywords. Data were collected using the Covidence platform, and articles published in English, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian were included. No limitations were applied regarding the publication year of the articles. They were then independently analysed based on their titles, abstracts and full text according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Conflicts were resolved via discussions with a third reviewer.
resultsIn total, 2033 articles were analysed from databases, of which 47 met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies used a structured methodology, while 29 were categorised as grey literature. The findings were organised into five key themes: (1) what organisations communicate (e.g., labour conditions, political content, health information); (2) with whom they communicate (e.g., nurses, journalists, political actors, the public); (3) for what purpose (e.g., advocacy, education, recruitment); (4) through what media (e.g., social media, websites, professional journals) and (5) how communication is evaluated (limited but promising insights on effectiveness).
conclusionsThis review provides the first diagnosis of communication management in professional nursing organisations. The lack of communication structures, trained professionals and effective strategies limits the effectiveness of communication among the entities. Studies are necessary to diagnose these shortcomings and design plans to improve the visibility and impact of their messages, positioning nurses as qualified and respected professionals. REGISTRATION: A review protocol was developed and registered in the Open Science Framework platform. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Because the research is a scoping review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.