Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488661›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Exploring Nurses' Decision-Making Through the Lens of Capability: A Framework for Understanding Autonomy in Complex Care Environments.

Patrick Lavoie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick LavoieFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-6484

Funding

Canada Research Chairs CRC-2024-00029Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 430-2022-00015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo apply the capability approach to understand ICU nurses' decision-making autonomy.

designA qualitative study using Amartya Sen's capability approach as a conceptual framework.

methodsThis study reanalyzed qualitative data from a previous investigation involving semi-structured interviews with 39 experienced Canadian ICU nurses who described their decision-making processes in managing post-cardiac surgery bleeding. The analysis examined how resources (e.g., information, therapeutic and human), conversion factors (personal, social and institutional) and professional agency interact to shape nurses' decision-making capabilities.

resultsNurses' decision-making capabilities encompass: (1) obtaining necessary information, (2) interpreting information to make judgements and (3) making actionable decisions. These capabilities enable nurses to achieve valued outcomes such as clinical effectiveness, patient and family comfort, professional growth and personal fulfilment. However, they are shaped not only by clinical expertise or competency but also by structural and contextual factors, including resource constraints, institutional policies, interprofessional dynamics and hierarchical relationships. These factors influence nurses' autonomy and real opportunities to translate clinical judgements into action.

conclusionsThe capability approach offers a reflective lens for examining the contextual conditions that shape nurses' autonomy. By shifting the focus beyond individual competence, it highlights the broader structural and relational influences on nurses' ability to make and implement clinical decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Understanding decision-making as a capability underscores the importance of creating supportive environments where nurses can apply their expertise. The findings call for context-sensitive strategies in education, policy and practice that valorise nurse agency and respond to the systemic factors influencing decision-making in critical care settings. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? This study examined the gap between nurses' clinical expertise and the ability to act on decisions in practice, exploring how contextual factors influence their autonomy in critical care settings. What were the main findings? Decision-making autonomy is shaped by the interaction of individual, organisational and systemic factors-including access to resources, team dynamics and institutional norms-underscoring the need for context-sensitive strategies to support nurses' decision-making. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? These findings can inform educators, policymakers and healthcare leaders seeking to strengthen decision-making, education and support, especially in complex or resource-constrained environments. REPORTING

methodThis report adheres to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCritical Care NursingDecision MakingNursing Staff, HospitalProfessional AutonomyAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcapability approachcritical caredecision‐makinginstitutional constraintsinterprofessional collaborationnurse autonomyprofessional agency

Identifiers

PMID40488661
PMCPMC12810590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.