Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488126›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2025

Design and Validation of Sleep Apnea Risk Assessment (SARA): A Screening Tool for Moderate-to-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Sarka Solecka, Hana Tomaskova, Milos Chudy, Tomas Kostlivy, Jana Slonkova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarka SoleckaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, St Luke's Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, 43-309, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9462-2032
Hana TomaskovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9608-1276
Milos ChudyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Tomas KostlivyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital in Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2606-9052
Jana SlonkovaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava- Poruba, 708 52, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-6846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We designed and validated a concise, efficient screening tool, the Sleep Apnea Risk Assessment (SARA), to identify patients at high risk of moderate to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Patients and methods: We conducted a two-phase, multicenter study from September 1, 2018, to October 31, 2023. We created Cohort A (n=221, mean age 50.5±13.0 years, 69.2% male) to design SARA and compared the results with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, STOP-Bang, and STOP questionnaires. Cohort B (n=253, mean age 48.0±13.4 years, 75.5% male) served for validation. Results: SARA comprises six variables with the highest accuracy: sleep apnea observed by the bedroom partner (8 points), snoring (5 points), male sex (3 points), age≥50 years (3 points), daytime fatigue (3 points), and body mass index≥30 kg/m Conclusion: The SARA is a promising new screening tool for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, demonstrating high sensitivity and a strong ROC curve. Further large-scale validation is recommended.

Indexed as

Berlin questionnaireEpworth sleepiness scaleobstructive sleep apneaSARAscreening questionnaireSTOP-bang

Identifiers

PMID40488126
PMCPMC12145793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.