Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488085›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

In Vitro Hydrolytic Degradation of Giomer-Based and Fluoride-Releasing Bulk Fill Composites Simulated for Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Mohammed Aldhafyan, Rawaiz Khan, Waseem Sharaf Saeed, Abdel Basit Al-Odayni, Rayan Asiri, Faisal Althagfan, Mohammed Aldawsari, Mohammed Alneghimshi, Ali Alrahlah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed AldhafyanRestorative Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Rawaiz KhanEngineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Waseem Sharaf SaeedEngineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5254-5665
Abdel Basit Al-OdayniEngineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan AsiriDental Internship Training Program, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AlthagfanDental Internship Training Program, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AldawsariDental Internship Training Program, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlneghimshiDental Internship Training Program, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlrahlahRestorative Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0385-8817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often leads to tooth demineralization and degradation of dental restorations, increasing surface roughness and reducing strength. Limited studies have addressed acidic pH effects on fluoride-releasing giomer composites. This in vitro study evaluates surface roughness and flexural strength (FS) of six bulk-fill compositesSTARK, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (FBF), SureFil SDR Flow (SDR), Tetric N-Ceram (TNC), X-tra fil VOCO, and Beautifil-Bulk restorative (BBR)before and after acidic exposure and abrasion caused by brushing cycles. Specimens tested included 60 disks (2 mm thick, 8 mm diameter) for surface roughness and 60 bar (25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm) for FS. Samples were immersed in hydrochloric acid (pH 1.2) at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by 5000 brushing cycles (100 cycles/min) using medium-bristle toothbrushes. Surface roughness (Ra) and FS were measured at the baseline and post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by conducting Shapiro-Wilk tests, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey posthoc tests (α = 0.05). Results showed that BBR exhibited the highest increase in surface roughness after acidic exposure and brushing, followed by SDR, TNC, and VOCO. FBF and STARK demonstrated minimal changes. FS reduction was most significant in BBR (86.11 to 69.79 MPa, 18.95%) and SDR (106.78 to 88.27 MPa, 17.14%). These findings suggest that giomer-based fluoride-releasing composites, such as BBR and SDR, are susceptible to acidic degradation and brushing wear.

Identifiers

PMID40488085
PMCPMC12138672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.