Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Co-design of a digital 24-hour time-use intervention with older adults and allied health professionals.

Henry T Blake, Aaron Davis, Maddison L Mellow, Melissa Hull, Bethany Robins, Kate Laver, Dorothea Dumuid, Timothy Olds, Hannah A D Keage, Lui Di Venuto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Age-Adapted Co-Design Methodology for Community Health Research Involving Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BMJ open · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Henry T BlakeAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Aaron DavisAustralian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environments (IVE), UniSA Creative, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Maddison L MellowAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Melissa HullAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Bethany RobinsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kate LaverDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Dorothea DumuidAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Timothy OldsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Hannah A D KeageJustice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lui Di VenutoCity of Onkaparinga, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ashleigh E SmithAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using co-design principles based on the Health CASCADE framework, we aimed to describe the collaborative process undertaken to develop a 24-hour time-use intervention, called Small Steps, which promoted gradual and incremental health-behavior change. A secondary aim was to reflect on the challenges and benefits of co-design in this project, offering insights into the "why" and "how" to co-design 24-hour time-use interventions with priority populations. Twelve participants were invited and participated in 6 co-design workshops (June 2023-January 2024). To prioritize older adults' views in the end-product, 8 adults aged >65 years (the target population) and 4 allied health professionals with >2 years' experience working with the target population were recruited. Workshops and activities were structured using the British Design Council's Double Diamond Design Process to stimulate design thinking. Where possible, participant-led documentation was used to reduce the bias associated with academic scribing and empower participants to provide input and facilitate ownership for the project. Workshop activities and discussions were captured through printouts, audio and iPad screen recordings and analyzed through reflexive thematic and content analysis. Co-designers contributed to all elements of the intervention including the website design, the content, and the level of researcher input during the intervention. Iterative improvements were made based on the unique perspectives and needs of the community experts. During the action planning process, older adults wanted both support and autonomy, while maintaining the freedom to adapt these options to their individual needs. Older adults also preferred a step-by-step approach, allowing for gradual behavior changes across the intervention to avoid feelings of becoming overwhelmed. The co-design process enabled the tailoring of the Small Steps intervention to the specific needs of its intended audience. Key factors contributing to the co-design included flexibility in the design process, fostering a supportive environment, and empowering participants through activities that guided and stimulated their thinking. These elements not only helped shape the development of Small Steps but reinforced the value of co-design in developing personalised interventions for older adults.

Indexed as

24-hour activity cycleco-creationhealth promotioninterventionphysical activitysedentary behaviorsleep

Identifiers

PMID40487986
PMCPMC12141298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.