ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Integrating ultrasound and serum indicators for evaluating outcomes of targeted immunotherapy in advanced liver cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiogenomics and machine learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: from foundations to clinical translation.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global contributor to cancer-related mortality, with advanced stages presenting substantial therapeutic challenges. Although targeted immunotherapy shows potential, many patients exhibit poor responses, underscoring the need for predictive tools to optimize treatment strategies. Emerging data indicate that ultrasound features (
aimTo develop a non-invasive predictive model for targeted immunotherapy in advanced HCC, incorporating both internal and external validation.
methodsPatients with advanced HCC who received targeted immunotherapy at two medical centers were enrolled and divided into internal training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Comprehensive clinical data were gathered. Initially, 13 machine learning algorithms were tested using the internal training cohort. The algorithm yielding the highest area under the curve (AUC) in the internal validation cohort was selected to construct a predictive model, termed the Target Immunotherapy Predictive Model (TIPM). TIPM performance was then compared with that of traditional tumor staging systems (tumor-node-metastasis, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, China Liver Cancer, Hong Kong Liver Cancer, and C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein in immunotherapy).
resultsA total of 306 patients participated in the study, with 143 in the internal training cohort, 62 in the internal validation cohort, and 101 in the external validation cohort. In the internal validation cohort, the random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.975, 95% confidence interval: 0.924-0.998). The key predictors for TIPM were tumor size, platelet count, tumor stiffness change, and white blood cell count. During external validation, TIPM outperformed conventional models, reaching an AUC of 0.899 (95% confidence interval: 0.840-0.957). Calibration curves demonstrated strong concordance with observed outcomes, while decision curve analysis confirmed TIPM's enhanced clinical value. Additional metrics, such as the net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement, further supported TIPM's superior predictive accuracy.
conclusionTIPM provides a robust tool for predicting targeted immunotherapy efficacy in advanced HCC, facilitating personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.