ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025
Clinical challenges, controversies, and regional strategies in snakebite care in India.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Snakebite envenomation remains a significant public health issue, particularly in southeast Asia, where diverse venomous snake species and resource-limited healthcare settings complicate effective management. This Health Policy employed thematic analysis of a panel discussion involving multidisciplinary experts with over 300 years of combined experience. Four key themes were identified: (i) the evolution of snakebite treatment paradigms, (ii) clinical and procedural challenges, (iii) debates over controversial practices, and (iv) the role of policy and research in improving outcomes. The findings emphasise the need for region-specific antivenoms, enhanced peripheral healthcare capabilities, and evidence-based treatment protocols. This work provides actionable insights to inform health policy, guide targeted training initiatives, and prioritise research on neglected areas in the management of snakebite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.