ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Manual vs. Mechanical Ventilation in Respiratory Parameters of intubated Patients During cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ventilation and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is of paramount importance. This study aimed to compare the effects of manual and mechanical ventilation on respiratory parameters of intubated patients during CPR. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 2024 on 61 intubated patients with neurological disorders admitted to the ICU of educational hospitals. Participants were allocated to either the intervention or the control group using block randomization with a block size of six. The intervention group received mechanical ventilation, while the control group received manual ventilation using bag valve mask (BVM). The effects of manual versus mechanical ventilation during CPR on key physiological and respiratory parameters, including venous blood gases (VBG), end tidal Co2 (ETCO₂), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21. Results: The study findings indicated no statistically significant differences between the manual and mechanical ventilation groups in terms of venous blood pH levels (P = 0.38), PCO Conclusion: These findings suggest that while pH, PCO₂, and HCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.