Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487885›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Advanced comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for early Parkinson's disease detection using vocal biomarkers.

Ajay Kumar, Jay Parkash Singh, Priyanka Paygude, Rachan Daimary, Sandeep Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ajay KumarDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-9050
Jay Parkash SinghDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Priyanka PaygudeDepartment of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rachan DaimarySchool of Media & Communication, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sandeep PrasadDepartment of Mining Engineering, AKS University, Satna, MP, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential of voice analysis-specifically sustained vowel phonation-as a non-invasive, cost-effective diagnostic method for early detection of Parkinson's disease (PD) using machine learning techniques. Methods: A publicly available dataset from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) repository, comprising 252 voice recordings (188 from PD patients and 64 from healthy individuals), was analyzed. Machine learning classifiers, including k-nearest neighbors (KNN), AdaBoost, and artificial neural networks (ANNs), were trained and tested on the dataset. Model evaluation was conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Kernel density estimation was applied to visualize and interpret classifier performance. Results: Among the classifiers, KNN demonstrated the best performance with an accuracy of 98.52% and a mean accuracy of 97.33%. ANN and AdaBoost achieved mean accuracies of 93.15% and 91.77%, respectively. All models performed well across standard evaluation metrics, indicating strong discriminative ability for detecting PD from voice data. Conclusion: The study confirms the feasibility of using sustained vowel phonation and machine learning for early PD diagnosis. The KNN classifier, in particular, shows excellent diagnostic accuracy. These findings support the integration of voice-based machine learning tools into clinical workflows, potentially enhancing early detection and management of PD.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkskernel density estimationk-nearest neighborsmachine learningParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40487885
PMCPMC12144366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.