ArticleEvolution letters2025
Do the "big four" orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.