ArticleHuman reproduction open2025
Automatic identification of human spermatozoa with zona pellucida-binding capability using deep learning.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Male Fertility Assessment and Treatment Across Historical and Contemporary Paradigms.Andrology · 2026Article
- Molecular interplay between sperm and oocyte: a narrative review.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Integrating Sperm Microscopy, Environmental Exposures, and Lifestyle Factors for Male Fertility Analysis: Protocol for the Nippon Semen and Environmental Exposure Database (N-SEED) Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based endometrial ultrasound radiomics habitat analysis for predicting pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Transitioning AI-based sperm assessment from proof-of-concept to clinical practice.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- AI-predicted zona pellucida binding: shortcut learning and clustered validation may overstate clinical portability.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Membrane Fusions During Mammalian Fertilization.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionCan a deep-learning algorithm, independent of World Health Organization (WHO) sperm morphology grading, be used to identify human spermatozoa with zona pellucida (ZP)-binding capability in assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A novel deep-learning model, irrespective of the conventional semen analysis, was established to identify human spermatozoa capable of binding to ZP for predicting their fertilization potential. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Sperm morphology evaluation is crucial in semen analysis to investigate male infertility and to determine the appropriate insemination methods in ART. The current manual assessment, which relies on microscopically examining individual spermatozoa based on WHO criteria, has shown limited predictive power for fertilization outcomes due to its highly subjective, labour-intensive nature, and high inter-/intra-assay variations. Deep learning is a rapidly evolving method for automated image analysis. Recent studies have explored its potential for automating sperm morphology analysis. However, algorithms trained on manually annotated datasets using existing WHO criteria have had little success in predicting ART outcomes. To date, no study has established an independent set of morphology evaluation standards based on sperm fertilizing ability for clinical prediction. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Spare semen samples were collected from men undergoing premarital check-ups at a family planning clinic. Immature oocytes at germinal vesicle/metaphase I stage, or mature metaphase II oocytes were donated from women attending the infertility clinic for assisted reproduction treatments. Acrosome-intact, ZP-bound spermatozoa were collected by our previously modified spermatozoa-ZP coincubation assay. ZP-unbound spermatozoa were collected from normozoospermic samples with defective ZP-binding ability, as evidenced by complete fertilization failure following conventional PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsA pre-trained VGG13 model was fine-tuned using our database to classify individual spermatozoa as either ZP-bound or unbound based on their automatically extracted morphological features. Confusion matrix was used to assess the model's classification performance, expressed in terms of accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision rates. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was utilized to measure the model's discriminative power. A 5-fold cross-validation was conducted on the training dataset to assess the model's performance on randomized subgroups. Saliency mapping was used to analyse pixel importance localized to the morphological features of sperm images. Clinical data of spermatozoa from three fertilization groups were used for clinical validation. Logistic ROC regression analysis was performed to evaluate the differences in predicted values between high and low fertilization groups, as indicated by AUC and MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A VGG13 model was fine-tuned to distinguish images of spermatozoa capable of binding to the ZP based on their morphological features with high sensitivity (97.6%), specificity (96.0%), accuracy (96.7%), and precision (95.2%). The model exhibited low learning variance (average accuracy: 97.4%; sensitivity: 96.0%; and specificity: 98.5%) across subgroups, with primary emphasis on the sperm head and mid-pieces in all images as indicated by the pixel importance. Its discriminative performance was clinically validated on over 33 000 sperm images collected from three fertilization groups. Overall, the model exhibited excellent generalization ability as reflected by the strong correlation between the predicted percentages of spermatozoa with ZP-binding per sample and their fertilization rates. A clinical threshold of 4.9% (specificity: 89.3%; sensitivity: 90.0%) was established to differentiate sperm samples with normal and defective ZP-binding ability. By conducting pairwise comparisons among 30 patients, the predicted values generated by the model outperformed conventional semen analysis assessed by our in-house embryologists in identifying patients who were likely to experience failure with conventional IVF. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The model is currently designed for high-resolution, air-dried, Diff-Quik stained sperm samples, and further research is required to validate its classification performance across different image qualities with a larger sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis newly established method can identify couples at high risk of unexpected IVF fertilization failure, enabling clinicians to offer alternative insemination methods to reduce the likelihood of suboptimal fertilization outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported in part by two Health and Medical Research Funds, the Food and Health Bureau, The Government of the HKSAR (07182446 and 11222236), and the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM 202211014). Two provisional patent applications related to the data presented here have been filed on behalf of The University of Hong Kong (i. application no. 63/511,375; filing date: 30 June 2023; current status: active; applicant: The University of Hong Kong; ii. application no. US 63/567,147; filing date: 19 March 2024; current status: active; applicant: The University of Hong Kong). The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.