ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Early Flap Reconstruction and Infection Rates in Open Lower Extremity Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soft-tissue reconstruction timing in ballistic lower extremity open fractures: impact on osteomyelitis and union.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- [Clinical efficacy of ALTF combined with "Y"-shaped great saphenous vein graft in repairing large soft tissue defects in the proximal-middle segment of the lower leg].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Autonomization of Microvascular Free Flaps in Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Microsurgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe open lower extremity fractures often require soft tissue reconstruction with a flap. Infection is a common complication of lower extremity flap coverage and is associated with prolonged hospitalization, high costs, and poor patient-reported outcomes. Elapsed time from injury to flap coverage can increase infection risk, but the optimal timing threshold remains debatable. We aimed to synthesize the literature and determine if time to flap is associated with reduced infection rates following traumatic lower extremity injuries. Methods: We searched 5 databases for articles published before March 2023. We included studies of 10 or more patients undergoing flap reconstruction for open lower extremity fractures. We extracted data on patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications and grouped individual data by time-to-flap: 72 hours or less versus more than 72 hours and 7 days or less versus more than 7 days. We performed meta-analyses at a significance level of α equal to 0.05. Results: Sixteen studies of 973 patients (986 extremities) were included. Reconstruction within 72 hours of injury was associated with a 52% reduction in infection (risk ratio [RR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.89]) and a 41% reduction in all complications (RR 0.59 [95% CI 0.36-0.99]). Reconstruction within 7 days of injury was associated with a 50% reduction in infection (RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.31-0.82]) but no significant reduction in total complications (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.28-1.15]). Conclusions: Flap coverage within 72 hours of injury reduces infection risk in patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction for open fractures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.