Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487775›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion, in combination and alone, for alcohol use disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.

Bo Söderpalm, Helga Lidö, Johan Franck, Anders Håkansson, Daniel Lindqvist, Markus Heilig, Joar Guterstam, Markus Samuelson, Barbro Askerup, Cecilia Wallmark-Nilsson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bo SöderpalmAddiction Biology Unit, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Department of Addiction and Dependency, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helga LidöAddiction Biology Unit, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Department of Addiction and Dependency, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan FranckDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders HåkanssonLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Psychiatry, Lund, Sweden & Office for Psychiatry and Habilitation, Malmö Addiction Centre, Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden.
Daniel LindqvistUnit for Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden and Office for Psychiatry and Habilitation, Psychiatry Research Skåne, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Markus HeiligCentre for Social and Affective Neuroscience, BKV, Linköping University, Sweden.
Joar GuterstamDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Markus SamuelsonMalmö Addiction Centre, Bokgatan 16, Malmö, Sweden.
Barbro AskerupAddiction Biology Unit, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Department of Addiction and Dependency, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia Wallmark-NilssonAddiction Biology Unit, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Department of Addiction and Dependency, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andrea de BejczyAddiction Biology Unit, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden & Department of Addiction and Dependency, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with an enormous burden of disease and cost to society. The dopamine deficiency hypothesis posits that negative reinforcement generated by a low brain dopamine state drives ethanol intake. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined administration of two dopamine-enhancing drugs, varenicline (a partial nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist) and bupropion (a weak dopamine-reuptake inhibitor) on alcohol intake in AUD. Methods: Participants aged 25-70 years with moderate-to-severe AUD (defined as ≥4/11 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM]-5 criteria) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, done at four outpatient clinics in Sweden. Participants were randomly assigned (block size 8) 1:1:1:1 to Placebo + Placebo, Varenicline + Bupropion, Varenicline + Placebo, or Placebo + Bupropion. After a 1-week titration period, Varenicline was taken as 1 mg orally twice per day and bupropion as 150 mg orally twice per day for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and all study personnel were unaware of treatment allocation. The two primary outcomes were phosphatidylethanol in blood (B-PEth) and self-reported percentage heavy drinking days (%HDD), assessed over a steady state 10-week-period (from start of week 2 to end of week 11). Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol analyses (PP) were performed using a sequential hierarchical statistical method. This registered study (EudraCT 2018-000048-24; clinicaltrials.govNCT04167306) is completed. Findings: Between March 4, 2019, and December 14, 2022, 384 participants were randomly assigned: Placebo + Placebo = 97, Varenicline + Bupropion = 100, Varenicline + Placebo = 96, Placebo + Bupropion = 91. 72% participants were male (277/384) and 28% female (107/384), median age 57 (13) years. In the mITT analyses, Varenicline + Bupropion reduced B-PEth (Cohen's d [d] = 0·39, p = 0·004) and %HDD (d = 0·31, p = 0·008) vs Placebo + Placebo. Varenicline + Placebo also reduced B-PEth (d = 0·30, p = 0·005) and %HDD (d = 0·36, p = 0·023) vs Placebo + Placebo. For both primary endpoints, differences between the Varenicline + Bupropion and Varenicline + Placebo groups were not statistically significant (B-PEth: d = 0·022, p = 0·97, %HDD: d = 0·027, p = 0·76), precluding further comparisons according to the statistical hierarchy. In PP analyses, both primary outcomes were reduced with Varenicline + Bupropion (d = 0·43 [B-PEth]; d = 0·41 [%HDD]) and Varenicline + Placebo (d = 0·29 [B-PEth]; d = 0·34 [%HDD]) compared with Placebo + Placebo. Nausea, the only safety concern, was more common in the Varenicline + Placebo group than in the Placebo + Placebo group (49/96 vs 11/97, p < 0·0001) and of longer median duration (45 (70) vs 10 (14·5) days, p = 0·001). Nausea incidence was lower in the Varenicline + Bupropion group vs Varenicline + Placebo (36/100 vs 49/96, p = 0·048) and of shorter median duration (16·5 (39·3) vs 45 (70) days, p = 0·010). Interpretation: Two brain dopamine elevating treatments (Varenicline + Bupropion; Varenicline + Placebo) reduce alcohol consumption compared with placebo alone. Effect sizes were largest when Varenicline and Bupropion were combined and compliance was high (PP-population). Bupropion reduced Varenicline-induced nausea. Varenicline + Bupropion or other mild dopamine enhancers should be further explored for treatment of AUD. Funding: This study was funded primarily by the Swedish Research Council.

Indexed as

AUDBupropionCombination treatmentRCTVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID40487775
PMCPMC12142338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.