ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025
Differences between patient- and therapist-rated working alliance and their relationships with physical rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Working Alliance (WA) significantly influences therapeutic success in psychotherapy or rehabilitation for musculoskeletal problems. The perception of WA often differs between patients and therapists. However, little is known about WA in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and its relationship with clinical outcomes following physical rehabilitation. This study aimed to examine the differences in WA between patients and physical therapists in the early phase of a physical rehabilitation program and explore their relationships with improvements in gait-related assessments. Methods: Twenty-one patients with PD who participated in the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment BIG program were included. Gait-related assessments, which included gait speed at 10-meter walking test (10-MWT) and timed up & go, were conducted before and after the program. WA was assessed using Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) for both patients and therapists after the completion of the fifth session. The difference between patient- and therapist-rated WAI was analyzed using an unpaired Results: Patients rated WAI scores significantly higher than therapists. Only patient-rated WAI scores were correlated with improvement rates in gait speed on 10-MWT, while therapist-rated WAI showed no significant correlation. Conclusion: The results suggest patients with PD perceived WA higher than therapists in the early phase of rehabilitation, and patients' perceptions may influence functional improvements in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.