ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Variations in hepatic circulation: a study of 500 abdominal computed tomography scans.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the liver and other abdominal organs helps surgeons improve preoperative planning, achieve greater surgical success, prevent complications, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Objectives: To report the prevalence of anatomical variation in the proper hepatic artery and portal vein observed through computed tomography. Methods: This retrospective study was based on 500 3-phase abdominal computed tomography scans. Variations in arterial anatomy were classified according to the Michels system (1966), while those in regarding portal vein anatomy were classified according to the Cheng system (1996). Results: A total of 31.2% of the cases showed variations in arterial vascularization, the most prevalent being type V (8.2%). No participants were identified with type X, and 0.4% could not be classified. A total of 21.8% showed variation in venous vascularization, with type IV being the most prevalent (8%). Conclusions: Medical knowledge of these variations and their prevalence is fundamental for the correct surgical management of upper abdomen pathologies and lower rates of postoperative complications. Variations not classified by previous trials should be categorized according to their clinical importance, and new studies should clarify national population patterns to reduce mortality rates from surgical procedures that involve these vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.