ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Surgical outcomes and indications for saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review.
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indications for surgical repair of saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms lack satisfactory evidence, and the risk of rupture has been questioned. We conducted a systematic review assessing surgical outcomes following repair of this condition. Eight studies were included, totaling 540 patients. Endovascular repair was the most common approach. Complications occurred in 18.99% of the patients, and unfavorable surgical outcomes occurred in 3.15%, of which cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities were the most frequent. Aneurysms with smaller diameters presented fewer complications and unfavorable surgical outcomes than those with larger diameters. The ideal threshold for repair remains uncertain. Although diameter is an important indicator, other factors should be considered. These aneurysms should be treated electively at earlier stages due to their uncertain rupture risk and the higher prevalence of complications at larger diameters. Further research is needed to establish clear treatment guidelines for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.