Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487727›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Dose assessment in moving targets and organs at risk during carbon ion therapy for pancreatic cancer with respiratory gating.

Christina Stengl, Jeppe B Christensen, Iván D Muñoz, Alexander Neuholz, Stephan Brons, Eduardo G Yukihara, Jakob Liermann, Oliver Jäkel, José Vedelago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina StenglFaculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Jeppe B ChristensenDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villingen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Iván D MuñozDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Alexander NeuholzHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Stephan BronsHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Eduardo G YukiharaDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villingen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Jakob LiermannFaculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Oliver JäkelDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
José VedelagoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has demonstrated promising treatment outcomes for pancreatic cancer. However, breathing-induced organ motion can compromise the efficacy of the treatment, leading to under- or over-dosage within the target and organs at risk (OARs). In this work, the dose during CIRT was simultaneously measured at the target and OARs using an anthropomorphic phantom to evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory gating for compensating breathing motion. Materials and methods: The Pancreas Phantom for Ion beam Therapy (PPIeT) was irradiated with carbon ions. The phantom features a pancreas with a virtual tumour and OARs including a duodenum, kidneys, a spine and a spinal cord. Breathing-induced organ motion was imitated with amplitudes of 0 mm (control), 5 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm while irradiating with and without gating. Dose measurements were performed using an ionisation chamber and passive detectors. Results: The prescribed uniform dose of 1.37 Gy in the virtual tumour was experimentally validated for the control. Breathing-induced motion of 20 mm led to a 75 % dose coverage at the target improving to 91 % with gating. For the OARs, the mean dose varied according to the organ, with gating showing no significant differences. Conclusions: Accurate CIRT dosimetry with variable breathing-induced motions can be conducted with PPIeT for a pancreatic tumour and the OARs. Gating mitigated the effects of breathing-induced motion in the tumour.

Indexed as

Anthropomorphic phantomCarbon ion radiotherapyOptically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs)Respiratory gating

Identifiers

PMID40487727
PMCPMC12141065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.