ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Reconstructed dose and geometric coverage for tight margins using intrafraction re-planning on an integrated magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system for prostate cancer patients.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: A sub-fractionation workflow enables a substantial reduction in planning target volume (PTV) margin in prostate cancer (PCa) patients by reducing systematic motion during magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. This study assessed geometric and reconstructed dose outcomes in patients treated with a tight-margin sub-fractionation workflow on a combined linear accelerator with a 1.5 T MRI scanner (MR-Linac). Materials and methods: We evaluated the sub-fractionation workflow with tight margins (2-3 mm) on 128 PCa patients who completed treatment with 5 × 7.25 Gy (36.25 Gy total dose). A traffic light protocol was applied based on residual motions to detect patients with unexpectedly large motions. When 'red' traffic light criteria were met, plans with larger margins (5 mm isotropic) were adopted for subsequent fractions. Intra- and inter-fraction dose accumulation was performed via an in-house developed deformable image registration algorithm. Results: A total of 89 % (114/128) of patients completed treatment with the initial tight margins. The mean 3D intrafraction shifts were 1.0 mm (SD: 0.6 mm) in the group with the tight margins and 1.9 mm (SD: 1.5 mm) in the patient group who switched to large margins. The median accumulated D99% was 34.9 Gy (interquartile range: 34.0-35.3 Gy) for patients with prostate shifts who switched to larger margins. In 57 % (8/14) of these patients, the accumulated D99% was above the threshold of 34.4 Gy. Conclusions: Tight margins of 2-3 mm can be safely applied for at least 95 % (122/128) of the PCa patients undergoing a sub-fractionation workflow on a 1.5 T MR-linac.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.