ArticleSurgery open science2025
Importance of social ties in dissemination of Commission on Cancer's synoptic operative report.
Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Clinical Trial Awareness to Practice: Factors Associated with Intent to Omit Axillary Surgery Based on the SOUND Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Bridging Operative Standards to Clinical Practice: A Case Comparison of Synoptic Operative Report Implementation in Breast Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Mapping Implementation Strategies to Address Barriers to Commission on Cancer's Accreditation Standards in Breast Surgery.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2020, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) launched templated synoptic element documentation in operative reports (SORs) as an accreditation standard to standardize and document surgical techniques for key portions of cancer operations. The study team identified multi-level factors influencing implementation of CoC's breast cancer SORs, including variations in surgeons' knowledge about the new SOR standard. One identified facilitator of SOR dissemination was social ties. To better understand mechanisms underlying social ties in disseminating breast SORs, we performed secondary analysis of key informant interviews in this study. Social ties were identified by characterizing the surgeon's relationship to that program's Cancer Liaison Physician (CLP) or surgeon belonging to a CoC affiliate organization (e.g., Cancer Research Program). The CLP serving as each program's designated physician quality leader was also the central actor receiving information directly from the CoC. We found that both the CLP's direct ties to the CoC, and indirect ties (e.g., personal ties to someone with direct ties to the CoC), facilitated early dissemination of information about SORs. Leveraging interorganizational ties and providing guidance to CLPs about how and when to communicate with providers about new standards may facilitate dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.