ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Impact of neurotoxicity and steroid therapy on cancer progression-free survival in lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cells.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a frequent complication of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Most patients achieve complete symptom resolution without long-term neurological sequelae, yet the impact of ICANS and steroid therapy on oncological outcomes remains inadequately explored. We investigated the association between ICANS and steroid therapy with progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We included large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. The primary outcome was 90-day PFS. The secondary outcomes included PFS, complete response, and overall survival (OS) at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days. The association between outcomes and ICANS and steroid treatment was assessed using logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline factors. Results: Overall, 241 patients were included. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 51-66), 81 (33.6%) were females, 67 (27.8%) developed ICANS, and 142 (58.9%) achieved 90-day PFS. There was no association between 90-day PFS and ICANS development (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.75-2.61]), maximum grade (aOR 1.24 [0.97-1.59]), duration (aOR 1.00 [95% CI = 0.95-1.05] per 1-day increase), or day of onset (aOR 0.98 [95% CI = 0.86-1.11] per 1-day increase). There was no association between 90-day PFS and steroid therapy (aOR 1.25 [95% CI = 0.73-2.14]) or cumulative dose (aOR 1.00 [95% CI = 0.98-1.01] per 100-mg increase). Similar results were observed for secondary outcomes, except for an association between ICANS and OS at 30 days (aOR 0.05 [95% CI = 0.01-0.54]) and 90 days (aOR 0.35 [95% CI = 0.15-0.80]). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ICANS and steroid therapy do not adversely impact the PFS in lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD19 CAR T cells. Yet, ICANS might be associated with reduced early OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.