ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025
Seizure outcomes in patients with brain metastases and epilepsy: a systematic review on the efficacy of antitumor treatment and antiseizure medication.
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum lactate dehydrogenase is associated with the presence and extent of preoperative peritumoral edema in melanoma brain metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond Epilepsy Control: Repurposing Antiepileptic Drugs in Central Nervous System Tumor Therapy.Cells · 2026Review
- LASSO-based nomograms predict early death in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastasis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Review
- Focusing attention on brain metastasis: Hot issues.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy is a common symptom in patients with brain metastases (BMs), and because of the rising incidence of BMs, adequate seizure management is warranted. We conducted a systematic review on seizure outcomes after antitumor treatment and antiseizure medication (ASM) in patients with BMs from solid tumors and epilepsy. Methods: A literature search was performed in 6 databases up to February 2024. Extracted outcomes were rates for (1) seizure freedom, (2) ≥50% seizure reduction, and (3) treatment failure (for ASM only). Weighted averages (WAs) were calculated for outcomes after surgery at 6 months follow-up. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results: We retrieved 2244 references, of which 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies were at critical, and 8 studies at serious risk of bias. The WA of seizure freedom rates at 6 months after surgical resection was 64% (based on 3 studies at serious risk of bias, Conclusions: Limited available evidence from heterogeneous study populations demonstrated that in the majority of patients with epilepsy due to BMs, seizure freedom 6 months after surgical resection may be reached. No substantial evidence on ASM efficacy and tolerability in patients with epilepsy due to BMs is available. High-quality cohort studies are warranted to expand the evidence on seizure outcomes after antitumor and ASM treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.