ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
A pilot study to quantify and describe personal social networks in patients with glioblastoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom burden in young adult brain tumor survivors: Key intervention targets based on patient-reported outcome network analyses.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- The Impact of Sociodemographic Disparities on Health-Related Quality of Life for Adults with Gliomas.Cancers · 2026Review
- Multiscale network perspectives on glioma: from tumour biology to symptoms, survival and treatment.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Associations of Critical Relationships With Distress and Burden in Caregivers of Patients With Brain Tumor.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with glioblastoma experience high physical and psychosocial symptom burden. Poor social relationships have been shown to increase the risk of neurologic illnesses and decline, and conversely, strong personal social networks (PSN) have been shown to reduce the risk of mortality and improve quality of life. The aim of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of measuring PSN in glioblastoma patients. Methods: We recruited 25 adult glioblastoma patients between the initial diagnosis and the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy from March to September 2023 in the outpatient neuro-oncology clinic and adapted PERSNET, a quantitative PSN assessment tool, to this population. We collected demographics, tumor measures, treatment courses, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL for Patients with Brain Tumors (EORTC QLQ-BN20) and conducted qualitative interviews. Results: The average age was 64.5 years old, 56% were female, and 84% had a Karnofsky Performance Status of 70 or higher. Patients had large network sizes (total size of patient's PSN; mean = 8.8). Participants stressed the importance of social support and how different people filled different roles in their oncology care. Behavioral and/or cognitive changes resulted in delayed presentation, and children, especially daughters, were important in advocating for presentation to the hospital. Conclusion: This is the first proof-of-concept study showing that PSN can be measured in patients with glioblastoma. Qualitative data showed that patients felt social support was very important, and different people in their networks addressed different domains of care: physical, emotional, and logistical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.