ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Challenges in implementing 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification in a resource-limited setting.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular profiling of pediatric medulloblastoma in Kazakhstan: Genomic alterations, subgroup distribution, and survival.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AOSNP-ADAPTR resource level-based recommendations on practical diagnostic strategies for medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging findings of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors and low-grade astrocytomas.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: Responding to the challenge in low- and middle-income countries.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- H3K27M-altered diffuse midline glioma: Experience and outcomes from a low-middle income country setting in the contemporary era.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 2021 World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors (CNS5) includes molecular biomarkers in the necessary diagnostic criteria for many tumors. Identifying these markers often requires next-generation sequencing (NGS) and/or DNA methylation profiling, presenting challenges in diagnosing these tumors in low or middle-income countries (LMICs) and other resource-limited settings. Here, we will illustrate the real-world scope of the problem by presenting a neuropathologist's experience with implementing the CNS5 criteria in an academic medical center in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods: CNS tumor biopsies received by a single neuropathologist (AG) in Karachi during a 6-month period (October 2022 to March 2023) were included in the study. Routine histologic processing, H&E and immunohistochemistry were performed. Results: A total of 443 tumor cases were received, 87 of those (19.64% of total, 36.86% of glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors) could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis. Top reasons for failure to reach a CNS5 diagnosis were low-grade gliomas or infiltrative glioma in pediatric/ adolescent young adults not further classifiable on histology, IDH-mutant tumors requiring 1p/19q testing to rule out oligodendroglioma, undifferentiated tumors with unclear lineage and adult grade 2 or 3 IDH-wildtype astrocytomas suspicious for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Send-out DNA methylation testing in 22 cases resolved the diagnostic questions in all except one case. Conclusions: Without access to molecular testing, up to a third of all glial, embryonal, and glioneuronal tumors could not be assigned a CNS5 diagnosis, leading to diagnostic ambiguity and therapeutic confusion. Until affordable molecular assays are available, CNS5 diagnostic criteria have limited applicability in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.