Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Cost-effectiveness of the 3E model in diabetes management: a machine learning approach to assess long-term economic impact.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Economic impact of education and empowerment interventions in diabetes care: a two-year prospective longitudinal analysis in a tertiary care population.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of the 3E model (education, empowerment, and economy) in diabetes management using advanced machine learning techniques. Methods: We conducted an observational longitudinal descriptive analysis involving 320 patients, who were grouped into intervention and control groups over a 24-month period. Results: The 3E model demonstrated significant cost reductions, with the intervention group achieving a 74.3% decrease in total costs compared to 41.8% in the control group while maintaining the same level of glycemic control. Machine learning models, including random forest and K-means clustering, were used to identify key factors influencing treatment costs and to segment patient subgroups that were most responsive to the intervention. Natural language processing techniques revealed medication patterns associated with greater cost reductions. Long-term projections using ensemble methods (such as XG Boost, Exponential Smoothing, and Prophet) predicted that, on average, each year contributes approximately 20% to the total cumulative savings over 5 years. No significant correlations were observed between cost reduction and socioeconomic factors, gender, or age, suggesting the broad applicability of the 3E model. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the potential of the 3E model to achieve significant reductions in diabetes management costs without compromising care quality, highlighting its value for healthcare policy and resource allocation in chronic disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.